|
A
Christmas Message To All Men,
Roger Eldridge
December 25th, 2004 Dear Friends, A
recent contributor to these lists
discussed once more the problem that
has beset anyone trying to organise
men to reverse the effects of
radical feminism. However once again
the author focused his attack on
criticizing men basically for not
being women and copying their
non-stop efforts to seek government
aid and play the victim. As my seasonal gift to all men, not just those who read these lists I would like to humbly offer my hypothesis about the fundamental nature of men and women and how this appears to unnervingly fit many of the facts that we have become aware of about the many differences between men and women that persist despite all attempts at 'equality'. It also goes some way to explain why we are in such a predicament and how we might begin to get out of it. If
there is broad agreement that there
is some merit in my hypothesis and
it can be further refined by the
movement to the point where every
man can empathise with its basic
premise and start to act on the
conclusions that can be drawn we can
begin to bring our societies back
into line with common sense again
rather than all the time being
surprised at the behaviour of women
and expecting men to act in a way
that is counter to their nature My
hypothesis, simplistic as it is,
goes like this. All
we can predict about our existence
is that we will die. Many of us
perform one more significant act -
we procreate. Our genes are the
driving force behind this because it
takes them into the next generation
and so on towards immortality. We
call this act of procreation sex and
we label the two sexual actors
"men and women", based
SOLELY by the role they each take in
the reproductive act. In
that act MEN have sperm and need to
find a willing 'woman' with eggs TO
GIVE their sperm to so that the
fertilised egg can become a new
human being with the genes of both
the man and the woman. Similarly
WOMEN with fertile eggs have to be
found by a willing 'man' TO RECEIVE
his sperm. I
believe this complementary act of
GIVING AND RECEIVING shapes and
differentiates at a very deep,
unconscious level the basic nature
and behaviour of men and women IN
EVERY OTHER SPHERE OF THEIR LIVES. I'm
proposing that if we were to
generalise we could say that MEN are
geared by their biology to spend
their lives with the impulse of
TRYING TO GIVE Similarly
WOMEN are programmed to spend their
lives WANTING TO RECEIVE Of course
these basic functions are hidden by
complex social mores that have been
developed over thousand of
generations by succeeding
civilisations as they attempt to
survive physical, social and
political changes but the basic
underlying biological imperative of
men and women remains. In
fact today with women closely
mimicking men and the way they dress
and 'social functions' becoming
blurred it helps enormously to
employ this method of looking at
people using the COROLLARY of the
hypothesis in order to define their
'sex'. Hence
we can say that PEOPLE
WHO SPEND THEIR LIVES TRYING TO GIVE
can be DEFINED AS MEN. PEOPLE
WHO SPEND THEIR LIVES WANTING TO
RECEIVE can be DEFINED AS WOMEN. Thus
women are naturally 'dependent' -
wanting someone to give them
something and men naturally
'independent' - not wanting someone
to give them something but being the
giver. >From
this it is easy to see how perfectly
NATURAL it is for women to act in
such a way as to ASK FOR HELP. MONEY
ETC ie to RECEIVE something -
anything! And
also it indicates how difficult and
unnatural it is for men to do the
same. MEN are THE GIVERS not the
receivers. Every
act of LEGITIMATE mainstream 'men in
power' has always been done for
altruistic reasons, ie for the
benefit of people other than
themselves personally. Whenever
men have organised in the past - in
unions, in war, in political
movements they have done it for
their families and for society, for
women and children and the common
good - never for anything
specifically for other men that
might be to the detriment of women
and children. Our nature and biology
dictates that we give to all other
humans who are dependent by nature -
women and children. The
vicious feminist propaganda, the
misandry that has been spread for
the past forty years has sought to
paint the opposite of this reality.
They have falsely depicted men as
the exploiters of women and
children. They
have procured women in order to
provoke a gender war. They have
bribed women to do this by
understanding that women's basic
function is to receive and so the
state has simply offered them more
money and control in return for them
to install the state in place of the
role of their husbands as
protectors, carers and educators of
their families. Men
have never been controlled by
physical means alone - not by
imprisonment nor chains nor by
giving them money FOR THEMSELVES.
However, because men are givers, it
is very easy to control them by
making them feel guilty and ashamed
of themselves and this is how the
feminists have almost achieved the
enslavement of men - by spouting
propaganda that proclaims MEN ARE
TAKING AND NOT GIVING. Whenever
a man hears about another man
misbehaving by NOT GIVING he
automatically steels himself to make
amends for that man's misdeeds and
shows it is not the natural state of
men by redoubling his own efforts TO
GIVE and condemning any man that has
betrayed his natural instincts. Men
are currently enslaved - actually
and emotionally - by the feminist
subversives who have gained control
by fomenting this phoney war. Men
are desperate to continue their role
as the givers but are being
prohibited from giving except in
narrowly defined areas. This
is why men pay child support so
readily even when it is unlawful and
logically works against their
children and their own
self-interest. This is why they
contribute 120% of government
revenue through income tax even
though they receive nothing in
return and women contribute nett
zero or a minus amount to the public
purse. This
also explains, by the way, why
'equality' is such a farce. How can
men and women be treated exactly the
same based on their subjective
'needs' when only one group - women-
naturally and biologically have
needs to receive and the other group
- men - want to give. You end up
with the ridiculous situation at
present where 'equality' in practice
means the state endlessly trying to
fill the bottomless pit of demands
from women at the expense of men who
can never compete in this game. It
also explains:
Men will never
organise themselves - if it appears
to be against women, no matter how
badly the women behave. 'Empowering'
women on the other hand encourages
them to do what comes naturally and
they have responded by asking for
more and more! and this reveals the
fallacy of the early feminist
so-called aim of liberation which
was supposedly to make women
independent (of men). Another corollary of
all this is that if men were to
start WANTING TO RECEIVE (be
dependent or play the victim)
instead of giving their sexual
function and their ability to
procreate would be diminished. This is exactly what
is happening and explains why
feminism has been identified as part
of the New World Order Eugenics
Programme, the plan to reverse
global population growth and breed
selectively instead from the chosen
elite so that they might enjoy the
resources of the world unencumbered
by the throngs of humanity. There is an urgent
need for men to collectivise and put
their combined efforts into the
focus of defeating feminism but men
will only organize themselves to do
this task once they realize that
feminism is nothing to do with
'women's liberation' and nothing
whatsoever to do with 'equality' but
everything to do with the social
engineers of the totalitarian state
wanting to control our every
movement and thought. These feminists do not
represent the wishes of the vast
majority of women. Like true
communists they work as part of
well-placed cells of subversives in
key government and state bodies. They are intent on
totalitarianism and so are preparing
for that by destroying the men who
represent the potential for any
resistance against their imminent
complete take-over of western
societies. For obvious reasons those
men that they have targeted are
husbands and fathers. Our great weapon is
the Constitutions (Irish, US,
British etc), which were given to
the people after the overthrow of a
tyrannical ruler to protect them
AGAINST THE POSSIBILITY OF THE STATE
BECOMING A TYRANT AGAIN. Our united aim must be
to use the principles of the
Constitution to identify these
subversives, expose them and their
deadly game and weed them out in
order to return to common sense and
build a civil society where this is
never allowed to happen again. If we fail the only
alternative is to build an Ark and,
like the Pilgrim Fathers, set out
for a new nirvana. Unfortunately, we
know that with today's
communications capabilities nirvana
cannot exist in isolation so we must
stand and face the enemy within. Our message this
Christmas and for the New Year is in
fact the traditional one - our aim
must be for men to employ at every
opportunity our natural talent -
that of Giving - of our love for our
families and for the common good. Our New Year
resolutions must be to seek to
interpret everything we know about
men in this new positive light and
so test the hypothesis. I feel
confident you will be pleasantly
surprised at how the hypothesis fits
the facts. Once we acknowledge and take pride in our 'giving' nature we will start to embrace our true legitimacy again and the moral high ground that goes with it. The feminists and social engineers will never be able to control us with shame and guilt again - organising ourselves will then happen naturally. Roger
Eldridge Chairman
of The National Men’s Council of
Ireland
|
